← The Divine Identity of Christ

Chapter 9 · Deep dive

The Son as Creator and Sustainer

The boundary between the uncreated God and everything that came to be

A person may be older or greater than another creature without being God. The more decisive biblical distinction is between the Creator and all that is created. John, Paul, and Hebrews repeatedly include the Son in the creative action on which everything else depends.

Historic Christianity does not imagine the Father hiring an independent junior deity. Creation is the work of the one God, described through the Father and the Son without making them the same person.

All things came through Him

Genesis begins with God creating the heavens and the earth. John deliberately opens with “in the beginning” and places the Word already there. Everything that came into being came through Him; John then states the exclusion negatively: without Him not one thing came into being that has come into being. The Word is not naturally included among the things whose beginning depends on Him.

A created-agent interpretation must make an exception for the Son or narrow “all things” to everything else. Ordinary speech sometimes allows implied exceptions, but John supplies no such exception and strengthens the universal with the negative clause. Hebrews’ enduring-Creator address reinforces the same boundary. The canonical reading therefore treats the Son as uncreated, not as the first item in the created series.

The term “through” distinguishes the Son’s relation to the Father in divine action. It does not automatically imply an inferior nature. Different prepositions can describe order and relationship without giving us different grades of deity. The Son is not an instrument separated from the God who acts; the whole testimony describes the one divine work through personally distinct Father and Son.

Firstborn of all creation

Prōtotokos

πρωτότοκος prōtotokos — firstborn

The term can mark birth order, status, inheritance, or preeminence in context. Psalm 89 describes the Davidic king as firstborn and highest among kings; Exodus calls Israel God’s firstborn. These are not claims that the king or nation was the first creature ever made.

Colossians calls the Son the image of the invisible God and firstborn of all creation, then explains that all things were created in, through, and for Him. Visible and invisible realities, including thrones, dominions, rulers, and authorities, are included. He is before all things, and they hold together in Him. The explanatory “because” ties firstborn status to His relationship to creation as its source and goal, not merely membership in it.

A non-Nicene reading may take “of all creation” as identifying the Son as part of the created class. Greek can express that idea — grammarians call it a partitive use of the “of” phrase, as in “the firstborn of the flock,” where the firstborn belongs to the group. The question is not whether Greek can say such a thing, but whether it fits here. The surrounding universal creative claims, His priority, and creation’s being for Him favor sovereign preeminence: the firstborn over creation, not the first creature within it. Translating repeated “all things” as “all other things” adds an exception not stated in the Greek.

Verse 18 calls Him firstborn from the dead. He truly died and rose; His resurrection inaugurates the new creation and His supremacy within it. The parallel does not require “firstborn of creation” to mean His divine nature was made. The hymn holds together His cosmic identity and His embodied saving work.

Sources and further reading

One God and one Lord

Paul addresses food associated with idols and the claims of many gods and lords. For believers there is one God, the Father, from whom are all things, and one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom are all things. The two expressions are related within a monotheistic confession, not a division into a true God and a tolerated lesser god.

Many scholars see a deliberate reformulation of the Shema’s God-and-Lord language; others explain Paul through Jewish wisdom traditions or agency language. We should label the exact intertextual reconstruction as an interpretation. What the text directly states is that all things are from the Father and through Jesus Christ, and that believers’ existence is similarly bound to both. The Son’s creative role is not a detail imported by a modern scholar.

The passage does not use the later word homoousios, nor does it independently give a full account of the Spirit. It contributes a powerful part of the cumulative argument: the one Lord participates in creation itself, while the confession rejects idols. This needs to be read with the Son being called God, sharing divine glory, and receiving divine honor.

Creation depends on the Son now

Sustaining is as significant as beginning. Colossians says all things hold together in Him; Hebrews says He bears all things by His powerful word. The Son is not a retired craftsman or a distant intermediary who disappears after the world is made. The present coherence and existence of creation depend on divine action.

For salvation this means the incarnate Savior is not merely one of the things needing ultimate rescue. He enters creation from the Creator’s side while genuinely assuming our humanity. His solidarity with us is not reduced by His divinity, and His authority to restore life is not detached from His suffering.

Key ideas

Key takeaways

  • The Son stands on the Creator’s side of the Creator–creature distinction.
  • Firstborn must be interpreted through Colossians’ explanation of creation.
  • Distinct roles in divine action do not establish unequal divine natures.